
What drives a person to kill? The vast (I hope) majority of crime-fiction writers have never killed a person, and they ignore the question. Fred Vargas confronts it head on.
In
Wash This Blood Clean From My Hand, the protagonist, Jean-Baptiste
Adamsberg, comes to believe he may be guilty of murder. He shares his doubts with a faithful colleague who, naturally, believes in him but, unlike most faithful colleagues, gives an explanation that goes beyond mere sentimentality and blind faith.
And you haven't any doubts?" [Adamsberg] asked.
"No."
"Why not? You don't like me, and there's a mountain of evidence stacked up against me. But you don't think I did it?"
"No. You're not the sort of man who would kill someone."
"How do you know?"
Retancourt pursed her lips slightly, seeming to hesitate.
"Well, let's just say that it wouldn't interest you enough."
Later, the colleague offers a fuller explanation to the abstracted, intuitive, brilliantly successful
Adamsberg:
"I admired your flair of course, everyone did, but not the air of detachment it seemed to give you, the way you disregarded anything your deputies said, since you only half-listened to them anyway. I didn't like your isolation, your high-handed indifference. ... you ought to listen when I say you didn't murder anyone. To kill, you need to be emotionally involved with other people, you need to get drawn into their troubles and even be obsessed by what they represent. Killing means interfering with some kind of bond, an excessive reaction, a sort of mingling with someone else. So that the other person doesn't exist as themselves, but as something that belongs to you, that you can treat as a victim. I don't think you're remotely capable of that."
How that works as psychology, I don't much know or care, and neither does Vargas. Hers is no psychological crime novel. If anything, it's a philosophical one and is the better for that. I mean, haven't we all had enough narration from the point of view of the psychopath or the man or woman driven to kill by a traumatic childhood? Isn't it nice to have a bit of analysis by someone other than the killer? Isn't it especially nice when, as in this novel, the killer turns out to be an obsessed sociopath of a particularly extravagant kind, and all we know of him is what he says in his brief appearances and what others think about him?
That's just one way Vargas makes
Wash This Blood Clean From My Hand so fresh and such a pleasure to read. Others are a sly wit, a sympathetic and just sentimental enough view of some elderly characters, and some delightful takes on the cultural conflict between French Canadians and French when
Adamsberg and his colleagues fly to Quebec for a seminar on DNA profiling. Vargas, a medieval historian and
archaeologist, also manages gracefully to work those interests into the story.
There was an outcry two years ago when Britain's Crime Writers’ Association split its main
CWA Gold Dagger award into two prizes, one for English-language crime fiction and one for translated crime. One happy result is that the
CWA this year was able to honor two superlatively good crime novels:
Wash This Blood Clean From My Hand,with the
Duncan Lawrie International Dagger, and Peter Temple's
The Broken Shore, with the
Duncan Lawrie Dagger.
© Peter Rozovsky 2007Technorati tags:
Fred VargasFrench crime fictionLabels: France, Fred Vargas