Friday, March 02, 2007

Gorgeous prose

If my posting seems more disjointed than usual, perhaps it will compensate by being more enthusiastic. I've had such a flood of superb books arriving in recent days, from Bill James, Friedrich Glauser, Peter Temple, Norbert Davis, and Richard Stark (Donald Westlake), among others, that I don't know what to read first. So I've decided to read all at the same time, or as close to it as possible.
First up is The Sixth Man and Other Stories, with its fine examples of Bill James' knack for dialogue whose meaning resides not just in what the characters say, but in how they say it. Here's an informant – a grass – in "For Information Only":
"What's known as sacrosanct, almost holy, is the relationship between a grass and his cop contact. This is totally private, one-on-one, what is sometimes also referred to as symbiotic, meaning they depend on each other."
And here are Mansel Shale and Ralph Ember conducting a joint meeting of their drug-pushing firms:
"Yes, Manse, Ralphy, you say that, but these people are – "
"We definitely got it in mind," Shale said. "Ralph and self, we note all factors, you can believe it."
"This goes without saying," Ralph told them.
"But Manse, Ralph, if we don't – "
"This is an area known in boardrooms and such as `executive action,' meaning leave it to Ralphy and me. You heard of executive action at all? A well known, corporation term you might of missed. The topics you mention are not for open talk at a meat and potatoes do."
Look at these criminals’ pride that they know the same words that educated people do: symbiotic, executive action. Look at their wonderfully comic self-consciousness: "What’s known as ... " "You heard of ... " These are pitch-prefect examples of upwardly mobile crooks who haven’t quite got the middle-class verbal mannerisms down. And that, in turn, is part of the delicious social comedy of the superlatively great Harpur and Iles series.

© Peter Rozovsky 2007

Technorati tags:

Labels: , , ,

2 Comments:

Anonymous Maxine said...

I'm in the same boat, Peter (too many good books coming in from all kinds of sources), but disjointed? You? Not, I would venture.

Look forward to more of your thoughts on these, as you work your way through them.

March 02, 2007  
Blogger Peter said...

The prose may be as lucid as ever, but the reading is disjointed: a story here, a chapter there. And that's just the crime fiction. Elsewhere in the world of letters, there are always historians to keep up with, and for some reason I am finding Kafka a particular comfort these days.

It's a pleasant dilemma, actually. The five writers I cited in my comment are arguably among the best ever at what they did, and they do not even constitute the totality of my current pile.

In the meantime, I'll keep up the pensées and maybe even throw in an aperçu or two along the way.

March 02, 2007  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home